Contemporary psychiatry is undergoing an identity crisis, largely fueled by an overwhelming focus on neurobiological research and medication-based treatments, often to the exclusion of psychotherapy. While advancements in understanding brain pathology are invaluable, this narrow focus risks reducing the complex reality of mental distress to mere cellular malfunctions, ignoring the profound impact of psychological experience.
This dangerous trend, as warned by experts like Dr. Richard A. Friedman, threatens to extinguish psychiatry’s unique role and has sparked radical proposals—including merging the field with neurology to create «brain medicine»—that fundamentally misunderstand the nature of mental illness.
The Fundamental Flaw: Confusing Structure and Function
The push to define all mental disorders solely as «brain diseases» and treat them primarily with medication stems from a flawed premise: that structural (organic) and functional (psychological) disorders are indistinct.
Mental disorders should be fundamentally divided based on their primary precipitating cause:
- Organic Mental Disorders: Originate in brain cells due to genetic issues or physical damage (e.g., Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Autism). For these, neurobiological treatments (medication) are primarily and effectively used.
- Functional (Psychological) Mental Disorders: Originate from the function of the brain, typically triggered by psychological trauma or environmental stressors (e.g., Depression from job loss, Panic Disorder, PTSD, Personality Disorder).
To assert that depression brought on by a psychological trauma is the same as a depressive episode in a bipolar patient is a conceptual error. While all mental disorders inevitably involve neurobiological changes—the brain is, after all, the organ of the mind—the appropriate and effective treatment differs depending on the origin.
The Historical Shift and Its Consequences
This unfortunate narrowing of the field can be traced back to the 1980 publication of the DSM-III. This revision made two significant changes that discouraged a psychological focus:
- It removed the requirement to consider the cause (causality) of mental disorders.
- It eliminated the diagnostic entity of neurosis, which was rooted in psychodynamic theory, to achieve broader diagnostic agreement among psychiatrists.
While the DSM is explicitly not a textbook that includes causality and treatment, its positions were largely adopted into clinical practice. This shift inadvertently created an easier path for practitioners. Providing dynamic psychotherapy requires substantial investment—typically 2 to 5 years of extra formal training, including personal analysis and financial burden—a commitment many psychiatrists chose to forgo for the simpler, quicker route of psychopharmacology.
The result is exemplified by patient cases showing serious flaws in modern care:
- Case 1: A patient initially treated for anxiety and depression triggered by a divorce (a clear functional disorder) was maintained on two different antidepressants and two highly addictive medications (lorazepam and dextroamphetamine-amphetamine) for 20 years. Despite claiming to receive «psychotherapy» (CBT), he only received symptom management, leading to long-term dependency instead of resolution.
- Case 2: A young man with anxiety and concentration issues, whose problems stemmed from family distress, was prescribed an antidepressant and amphetamine. The amphetamine induced acute psychosis. After receiving dynamic psychotherapy for only a few months, he successfully went off all medications and restored his normal life, demonstrating that his original problem was psychological, not a medication deficiency.
Psychotherapy’s Irreplaceable Value
The enduring debate over «Psychiatry’s Identity Crisis» underscores the anxiety that something essential is missing when psychotherapy is sidelined. Psychotherapy—particularly dynamic psychotherapy—is not merely «talk therapy»; it is grounded in science and humanism, serving as the necessary means to engage and understand subjective psychological experience.
While neurobiological treatments for functional disorders exist, they are often insufficient. In contrast, extensive research, including the globally acclaimed meta-analysis published in the American Psychologist by Dr. Jonathan Shedler, has established the efficacy and superiority of psychodynamic psychotherapy for many conditions.
Shedler concluded that patients receiving psychodynamic therapy not only maintain therapeutic gains but continue to improve over time, a benefit often superior to medications, CBT, and DBT. This improvement stems from addressing the deep-seated psychological roots of the disorder rather than just managing surface symptoms.
Restoring the Identity of Psychiatry
The current practice of prioritizing medication for all mental distress has contributed to the unnecessary prolongation of suffering and the proliferation of social problems. Ignoring the functional aspect of the mind for the sake of only treating brain cells is, quite simply, neurology, not psychiatry.
To restore the field’s holistic identity and improve patient outcomes, several drastic steps are needed:
- Expand Neurobiological Research to specifically compare and elucidate the distinct changes that occur in organic vs. functional mental disorders.
- Mandate and Strengthen Training in dynamic psychotherapy for all mental health clinicians. This will enrich psychiatric practice and dramatically increase patient recovery rates.
- Recognize Psychoanalytic Expertise as a valuable perspective that provides a broader view of mental health practice.
Achieving this shift may take decades, but it is a necessary endeavor to address the root causes of our current mental health crisis and affirm psychiatry’s unique role as the discipline dedicated to the mind’s invisible functions as well as the brain’s physical structure.
#Psychiatry #Extinct
